Jump to content

Talk:Vithkuq

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Vithkuq. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:42, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Citation

[edit]

@Alexikoua can you please add the full quote from the book to support your last edit[1] in this article? Or was it simply your translation? Çerçok (talk) 08:48, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I always use the correspondent reference to make adjustments/additions. Fact is that the names of those quarters are cited. If the translation is correct or not you need to ask [[2]] Alltan. You don't wait for an English user to understand what "Rusasi, Tatasi and Krekasi" means, correct?

Alexikoua (talk)

Alright then they need to be removed. And no, they are not clear in their meaning. If they author had mentioned it, it would have been different. Çerçok (talk) 17:31, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have self-reverted the change for now, can you please be clear, does the author translate them as you wrote them or not? If yes, please add the full quote here. Çerçok (talk) 19:10, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The author mentions the neighborhoods of Dukates and Boris, when we have the neighborhoods of Dukasi and Borisha. What is going on here? Alltan (talk) 19:13, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Alexikoua has added "(of the Russians)" after Rusasi, "(of the Greeks)" after Krekasi and "(of the Tatars)" after Tataci. I am trying to understand whether the author explicitly mentions these bracketed interpretations but Alexikoua's first answer above is not clear. Çerçok (talk) 19:17, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It was added because the reference reads " The city was spread over a large number of quarters, with names as Dukates, Boris, 'of the Greeks', 'of the Tatars', `of the Russians',". If they were translations of specific -already existing in text- neighbourhoods that's not mine interpretation [3]. I'm good enough to assume good faith, I suggest you should too. Needless to say that removing this sourced information constitutes wp:DISRUPTION. Also if you don't feel that Giakoumis meets wp:RS (a notable scholar in Albania) you need to take it to RSN.Alexikoua (talk) 05:18, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Dukasi and Dukates, Borisha and Boris seem to be the same names, the sources that attest those names should be checked to provide the accurate forms. As for Rusasi, Krekasi, and Tataçi interpretation by Giakoumis, they are very arbitrary, and he does not provide the originally attested forms. The addition of that interpretation to the attested names as writtent in the current version of the article is WP:SYNTH. – Βατο (talk) 10:36, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Vithkuq&oldid=1195479311"