This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist Church, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Seventh-day Adventist Church on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Seventh-day Adventist ChurchWikipedia:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist ChurchTemplate:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist ChurchSeventh-day Adventist Church articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles
The paragraph that contains "Even though it may be mere speculation, it is not implausible to suggest" seems to cry out for a citation which can't really be done with "mere speculation". It sounds highly POV and doesn't seem appropriate for an encyclopedia. Frankly having the majority of the article discussing one brief episode in the history of the station seems out of proportion. Perhaps someone could add something of modern relevance such as current program listing to help balance things out? Sdenny12302:19, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I completely agree with you about that part being not appropriate for an encyclopedia. I deleted that part of the section since there was no citations or support for the paragraph. Immerpunktlich05:26, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]