Talk:WVAH-TV

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Kentucky / West Virginia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Kentucky portal This article is supported by WikiProject Kentucky (assessed as Low-importance).
	West Virginia portal This article is supported by WikiProject West Virginia (assessed as Low-importance).

There is overwhelming evidence that Glencairn/Cunningham is simply a shell corporation used by Sinclair to evade FCC ownership rules.

I removed this unsourced speculation (which effectively "poisons the well"). This should not be returned to the article until/unless the article has been rewritten in NPOV style so that it would be put in proper context and the assertion can be sourced per WP:V and WP:RS. 147.70.242.40 (talk) 23:21, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Accusations of Legal Violations

This article contains allegations of violations of the law (via violations of FCC rules) without providing any sources. I have tagged two of the most egregious examples of this. If these cannot be sourced immediately, they need to be removed. I do not have sources to offer, so I am hoping others do. I will be watching this carefully, however, and if these are not sourced quickly, I will be removing them. Ithizar (talk) 18:36, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It has now been one week without any sources provided or any response to my concerns. I have therefore removed the unsourced accusatory statements from the article. They can easily be re-inserted should someone be able to provide a reliable secondary source. Also, I have tagged a couple of other statements that are not quite as direct, but still imply illegal behavior, as needing sources. One of them had originally been "sourced" by linking to an anti-Sinclair web site, which would not be a reliable source by Wikipedia standards. In any case, though, the link now directs to a generic political news web site and is not a valid source at all. Should these statements not get sources soon, I will remove them as well. Ithizar (talk) 14:43, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It has now been one month since I posted my original concerns, and no one has provided sources for the remaining accusatory statements. I have therefore removed them from the article. Anything I have removed can be easily re-inserted should sources be available. Ithizar (talk) 18:12, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Grace Under Fire

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Can you please remove the show from the article, cause it's no longer aired on local stations. Thank you. 37.235.52.16 (talk) 03:59, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been tagged as out-of-date for three months now, and nobody has come to fix it. Rather than expect to keep it up to the minute when nobody is maintaining it, I've changed "includes" into "includes or has included". --Stfg (talk) 14:48, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on WVAH-TV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070914125657/http://multichannel.com:80/article/CA6349903.html to http://multichannel.com/article/CA6349903.html
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:42, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]