This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Water, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Water supply-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WaterWikipedia:WikiProject WaterTemplate:WikiProject WaterWater
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change
"Africa has about 9% of the world’s fresh water resources and 11% of the world’s population." I realize that it would be fitting to start with saying how much of the world's fresh water there is in Africa, but combined with the "11% of the world's population" this seems to draw on the issue of water shortage. Problem is, 9% to 11% doesn't sound very problematic. If we want to start by addressing the continent's water shortages I feel like it could be worded more appropriately. Bataaf van Oranje (Prinsgezinde) (talk) 15:14, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Good point. I've lightly rearranged the first paragraph to draw out the main point, which is that overall there ain't much of a shortage, but that conceals wide regional differences... Hope it works for you now. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:33, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi User:John Cummings and User:Chiswick Chap, I wonder how you feel about this article six years later. I came here while doing work on Climate change in Africa, thinking about water-related content, and what should go there and here. However, as noted above, the article's title and scope is very unclear. That UNESCO publication that was cited so many times was more focus on jobs. I really don't know what to make of this article but one solution could be to change its title. A suggestion above, a possible new title could be Water-related industry in Africa. - Note we also have Water issues in developing countries which would overlap a lot with an article that was truly about "water in Africa"... EMsmile (talk) 11:00, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK cool. I'll just wait another day or two, to give John Cummings time to react. If no objection from him then I'll do it. Thanks. EMsmile (talk) 11:29, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have moved that content now and have requested a name change for the article with Twinkle. Copying below a comment from the GA review in 2017: "The article is titled "Water in Africa," but only addresses water as it relates to industry in Africa. There is no discussion of water bodies in Africa, water consumption, sources of water, seasonal variation, etc. The article devotes extensive explanation to tangentially-related topics, such as job creation, and population growth. The list of fisheries also includes marine fishing statistics, which are irrelevant to an article about water in the continent of Africa." EMsmile (talk) 07:38, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]