Talk:We're Not Afraid
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please respect process
[edit]84.9.130.70, please don't revert war to try to get round a VFD decision. No, this is not a question of you liking one opinion and I liking another—I haven't even formed an opinion about these sites, I just want for a) this article to be encyclopedic and b) for the VfD on We're shitting ourselves not to be subverted. Take a look at the *title* of the article, please, and don't change the whole focus of the text into projecting the message of the parody site instead! That's disruption of Wikipedia and contempt of process, i. e. contempt for the people who took the trouble to vote in the VfD. Bishonen | talk 11:33, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
- The parody/critique site is relevant, and since the article about it was deleted, this is the best place to put information about it. Nobody voted for censorship; or if they did, they should be held in contempt.
- Having said that, to my taste a link is enough. Mirror Vax 11:48, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
- The dispute is now moot; We're Shitting Ourselves! is dead. Jay Maynard 12:47, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- Unknown-importance Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- Stub-Class London-related articles
- Low-importance London-related articles
- Stub-Class Websites articles
- Unknown-importance Websites articles
- Stub-Class Websites articles of Unknown-importance
- Stub-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Websites articles