Talk:Weekend Today (Australian TV program)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
capitalisation
[edit]Robbo128, regarding capitalisation - specifically these edits:
WP:MOSCAPS is fairly clear about capitalisation - in general we do not capitalise anything other than the first word. In some cases, you may be correct in capitalising the name of a specific segment (eg "Hollywood Gossip" sounds like a specific segment name), but generic roles (eg "co-host") should no be overly capitalised. However currently they are all under the general heading "roles". Can I suggest that you change the table to use separate columns for:
- specific "segment names" (eg "Hollywood Gossip") - these could reasonably be capitalised (eg per MOS:CT)
- generic roles such as "co-host", "entertainment editor" - these should not be capitalised (except the first letter)
Mitch Ames (talk) 12:26, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- References would help also, to support the name and capitalisation of the segments. Likewise a newline to separate segment titles for clarity. Example. Mitch Ames (talk) 03:43, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
File:Weekend Today Logo.png Nominated for Deletion
[edit]An image used in this article, File:Weekend Today Logo.png, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Weekend Today Logo.png) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 02:38, 27 April 2012 (UTC) |
Notable people
[edit]In the words of another user:
“ | Lists of people must meet the criteria listed at WP:LISTPEOPLE. Articles have been protected to prevent these additions and/or the editors in question blocked when they persistently continue to reinsert inappropriate material. If a name is included in the article in this way, it has to show that it's relevant to the subject by meeting WP:LISTPEOPLE. Just because a station lists its employees doesn't mean Wikipedia needs to as well, and other station articles needing similar cleanup doesn't mean this one doesn't need to be cleaned up, because whenever it's actually discussed on a station article, the end result is the same; the names that don't meet WP:LISTPEOPLE are removed. Wikipedia is also not a directory. See here, here, and here for previous discussions about this. | ” |
In other words -- DON'T ADD NAMES WITH RED LINKS! They are NOT NOTABLE! Corkythehornetfan (Talk) 04:59, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:53, 28 January 2023 (UTC)