Talk:Werndl–Holub rifle

	Austria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	European military history task force

Movement

I think this page should be renamed (moved) to Werndl-Holub rifles, since the M1867 was not the only model of the Werdl-Holub rifle family. M11rtinb (talk) 22:33, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What were the other models? Makes sense to me. Faceless Enemy (talk) 16:24, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The two later models were the M1873 and the M1877. These were slightly different, but in my opinion do not "deserve" their own articles and should be added to this one. M11rtinb (talk) 16:41, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. Done (WP:BOLD). Faceless Enemy (talk) 16:50, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]