Jump to content

Talk:Wildhoney (Tiamat album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Untitled

[edit]

I don't know, the current text pushes Wildhoney too far to the Black Metal, while this is actually the first album by Tiamat on which you cannot hear the black metal roots anymore. It certainly is one of the most influential albums in metal, but I would not throw it in with Enslaved or Dimmu Borgir, rather Novembers Doom, Lacuna Coil and the like, modern Doom or Gothic Metal. Thomas Hettenhausen 13:01, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Tiamatwh.jpg

[edit]

Image:Tiamatwh.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 03:03, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Tiamatwh.jpg

[edit]

Image:Tiamatwh.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 20:50, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

[edit]

I believe the infobox should stay as a graphic resource for say, people giving a kick look at the article, please don't delete it again. Two reviews is a lot more than what I've seen in other articles, and i think the use of it is justified. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 179.7.174.66 (talk) 12:31, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello user, I don't really disagree with the genres you added, but per Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Sources#Online_only, we don't use the AllMusic sidebar as a source as it's not added by the people who review the albums. If you want this rule changed, I would take it up with the talk page on WP:ALBUMS. In the meantime, I'll have to take the sources down. No hard feelings!Andrzejbanas (talk) 05:21, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]