This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
I have a source (Robert Tanner's Stonewall in the Valley, Stackpole Books) which claims that Jackson actually hated Taliaferro and viewed him as, and I quote, "incompetent". This directly contradicts the following line, taken from this article:
"... however, Jackson respected Taliaferro's leadership and military ability ..."
What would be the best course of action in this scenario? It was well known that Jackson had very strict standards for his subordinate commanders and would often make the lives of those whose command ability he did not endorse a living Hell. Despite being apparently viewed as a competent general by Jackson (according to this article), he was transferred out of the Army of Northern Virginia before 1863 to command a backwater post in Georgia. Cheef117 (talk) 01:30, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
