Talk:William F. Vallicella

This article was nominated for deletion on 2 December 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Philosophy: Metaphysics / Religion Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Metaphysics
	Philosophy of religion

Notability

I tagged for notability because nothing in the article suggests that he meets the notability criteria. Just having published books and articles isn't sufficient to establish notability for an academic, and having a blog doesn't establish notability for anyone. --RL0919 (talk) 17:55, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If the blog gets a million readers a day I would disagree. His doesn't, so my point is moot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.16.225.228 (talk) 00:59, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]