Talk:Wirth–Weber precedence relationship

This page is almost entirely about a concept refered to as "the pivot", which is not defined on this page, nor is it even mentioned on any of the pages cited by this one except Simple precedence parser... which also does not define it.

69.141.153.15 (talk) 01:50, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

It would be nice to have a few words about the meanings of the various symbols in the formal definition section. For example, what is $G$, what is $V_{n}$, what is $V_{t}$, what is $S$ and what is $P$? -- Lilwik (talk) 01:36, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

This page probably should just be merged into Simple precedence parser, or both should be merged into Simple precedence grammar as a section, with this link pointing to the section. It almost seems as if it has originally been cut from that page, as that page begins with outlining an algoritm beginning with "Compute the Wirth-Weber precedence relationship table" but then when the algorithm is presented in detail it begins with a grammar, then skipping to "and the Parsing table: ". (From the history of Simple precedence parser I gather that the phrasing originally was "Given the grammar: ... and the parsing table: ..." but shoddy editing has messed the article up even more than it was originally.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.186.55.135 (talk) 20:42, 26 March 2023 (UTC)