Talk:Women's Aid

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

the edits by 81.179.69.218 needs to be checked for NPOV --Melaen 16:41, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The "controversies" section is almost laughably biased against the group. I'm changing it.

No it isn't - everything is factual and fully backed up with very reputable sources. I'd say the rest of the article is laughably biased towards the group. I'm changing it.

There is no other references in the article at all. If you wipe that section off then the entire article needs to be wiped off. It is ridiculous demanding one section to be vigorously referenced when the whole article doesn't. It is hard to google their YouTube page and see the videos for themselves. -- Writer —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.173.108.154 (talk • contribs)

Service to Men[edit]

Just to avoid any further deleting of the help for men section here is the screen shot of the site as of 6th March 2008 proving that section of the article to be 100% accurate: -- [deleted image removed] Shakehandsman (talk) 00:41, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]