Talk:Women's Environment and Development Organization

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): ShakeithaG.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:09, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2019 and 6 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Aurebal, Kmflynn2, Adesolao. Peer reviewers: MoniqueAlyese, Hawkesjulia, Skyyron.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:09, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tana's Peer Review for Shakeitha

Lead Section: Your first couple sentences do a good job of clearly stating what the article is about. I think in your situation you don't really need to add a summary just because your article is shorter so it would be repetitive if it was added.

Organization: Organized well into 2 paragraphs

Content: I think you did a good job at using what you could find to make an article about it since there is such limited information.

Citations: Citations look good to me!

Good job!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tanamoody (talk • contribs) 23:01, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]