Talk:Worldline SA

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

delete, 25 March 2017, see discussion.
delete, 13 July 2016, see discussion.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

ContributeurT (talk · contribs) has been paid by Worldline on their behalf. Their editing has included contributions to this article.

Possible page move?

@Suffusion of Yellow: What would you say to moving this page to Worldline (company)? As you mentioned here, all of the incoming links for Worldline refer to the concept in physics, and it should probably redirect to World line. I think the French company is notable, however, despite its enwiki article being created by a paid editor; I'd like to see a discussion at AfD if you are concerned about notability. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 03:45, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also pinging Rosguill, since they initially marked this page as reviewed. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 03:49, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Lord Bolingbroke's suggestion. I've also slapped on a COI tag, as the article has a few non-neutral bits that could use further attention, as well as the overcitation. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 06:02, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill and Lord Bolingbroke: I don't really care if the company page exists or not and won't AfD it myself. I saw a term with 13700 Google scholar hits being repurposed by a paid editor, and perhaps reacted too harshly. Probably should have just moved it myself. Moving the page to Worldline (company) will remove my objection, but note the previous AfDs (1 2). Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 20:05, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the deleted revisions, the sourcing has been significantly improved since last time, and given the high proportion of French-language coverage, I'm not terribly surprised that people failed to find sources in prior discussions _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:08, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello everyone, I created this page, I understand to change its name to Worldline (company) and thank you for the action as I don't want to disturb the redirection to the World line physics term. Please tell me if I can improve something.