Talk:Wright Glider

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Smithsonian Institution Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of Smithsonian Institution WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Smithsonian Institution and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Smithsonian InstitutionWikipedia:GLAM/Smithsonian InstitutionTemplate:WikiProject Smithsonian InstitutionSmithsonian Institution-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Untitled

The merger of these articles was discussed on the 1902 Wright Glider talk page, but merger occured before completion of discussion, only 2 days after discussion began and thus no consensus was reached. I have proposed that the page be split back into the sections that it was originally in (ie. one page per glider), rather than simply reverting, as I do not wish to start a reversion war. My posistion is that the merger should be reverted. --GW_Simulations 19:41, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bad form that discussion wasn't completed, I guess, but I disagree that the merger should be reverted. Unless and until there is significantly more substantial info for any of these aircraft, having a separate article for each is overkill. I do think that perhaps the title should be changed to "Wright Gliders", though. SFT | Talk 03:21, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree merger. As mentioned, not enough substantial information is present to warrant each glider having its own page. An example would be the North American B-25 Mitchell bomber, there were several different models (A,B,C,D,G,H,J being notable) and each had a different attribute. However, there is substantial information and specifications on each. Even in this case, there has not been a proposal to split the articles that I know of, and there is much more information for each page. But here, just not enough is present. Zchris87v 06:04, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As a contributor to the Wright Brothers article (including the Glider section), I also think separate glider articles are not necessary. In fact, more information could be added about each glider in this article, without making the article very long. I think it's more convenient and useful for the reader/researcher to keep them all together in one article. DonFB 06:38, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article still needs a lot more content before thinking about splitting it. I'm going to pull the tag since this seems to be a dead issue for now.Dhaluza 03:36, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

why milhist, is it because mr. buffett said he should have shot them down? Accotink2 talk 20:21, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Wright Glider. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:23, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]