Talk:Wycombe Railway

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buckinghamshire, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BuckinghamshireWikipedia:WikiProject BuckinghamshireTemplate:WikiProject BuckinghamshireBuckinghamshire articles

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Wycombe Railway RDT.

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result was merge into Wycombe Railway. -- Redrose64 (talk) 16:07, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We have two articles which clearly cover the same subject, see WP:CFORK; I don't see why two are required. I suggest that Wycombe Railway Company, being the smaller article and also the one with the fewer links, be merged into this article. Whilst there are several discrepancies, these should be easily resolved by examination of the cited references. --Redrose64 (talk) 17:52, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed as per nom. Not notable enough to warrant its own page. Lamberhurst (talk) 07:30, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support There is a great deal of overlap: any information in Wycombe Railway Company that isn't duplicated can be merged in Hertzsprung (talk) 20:09, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support Wycombe Railway Co. has less text and Wycombe Railway is a better overall name. Eldumpo (talk) 07:40, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Redrose64 (talk) 16:07, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Underbridge v overbridge

Surely the railway would pass over an underbridge and under an overbridge. As it stands the article doesn't make sense. 83.104.249.240 (talk) 05:29, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done Agree; have transposed them, and also linked the first instance of each term to a suitable definition for those still confused. --Redrose64 (talk) 10:55, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Wycombe Railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091223103017/http://www.broadgauge.org.uk/oldsite/history/line-wycombe.html to http://www.broadgauge.org.uk/oldsite/history/line-wycombe.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:43, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]