Talk:Xianglong
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I realized, is Xianglong even a lizard? Please respond. It is an archosaur of something, I'm pretty sure there's a mistake here. Ammonight423 (talk) 05:24, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
- I found the description online (pdf), and it says "acrodont lizard"; shows up in a polytomy with Agaminae, Leiolepidinae, and Chamaeleonidae, so it's apparently a lizard. J. Spencer (talk) 15:16, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Palaeontology articles
- Low-importance Palaeontology articles
- Low-importance Start-Class Palaeontology articles
- WikiProject Palaeontology articles
- Start-Class amphibian and reptile articles
- Low-importance amphibian and reptile articles
- Start-Class amphibian and reptile articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles articles
- Start-Class China-related articles
- Low-importance China-related articles
- Start-Class China-related articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject China articles