Talk:Y-Zet

This article was nominated for deletion on 6 June 2019. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Fights case[edit]

I've expand this article with reliable soures; WikiAviator what reason you revert reliable sources proved content? Check here [1]. Princess of Myadaung (talk) 11:20, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'am experienced IP editor without account; i have full knowledge in En wikipedia. I'll report you to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Princess of Myadaung (talk) 11:28, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I fail to see the relevance of this.Slatersteven (talk) 12:07, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reasons of reverting stated in User:Princess of Myadaung's talk page. Also, the user personal-attacked me using short-formed foul language.WikiAviator (talk) 12:29, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The edit is not relevent because this is just an unneccesary change of wording, which is not constructive. These uneccessary changes are disruptive. WikiAviator (talk) 12:29, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is where, provide the diff please.Slatersteven (talk) 12:41, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Asking "wtf" is a personal attack now? GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 12:30, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is where, provide the diff please.Slatersteven (talk) 12:31, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is the one in question? [2] GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 12:37, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think there was an edit conflict, I was replying to WikiAviator.Slatersteven (talk) 12:41, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

the edit I see as nonconstructive is here:

Revision 900560435. See page history for the wtf and the talk page for both users for the user's insolent attacks.WikiAviator (talk) 01:55, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You can't just link to it? El_C 01:56, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do it later cause I am using my mobile. The revision I am referring to is the revision before I first reverted by an IP user who now becomes registered.-WikiAviator (talk) 02:12, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see an issue with that edit summary — I think you are being oversensitive. El_C 02:33, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Asking and replying to WikiAviator) Oh My God, Wait!! "Wtf" is personal attack? It is "interjection" How to personal attack???. Princess of Myadaung (talk) 02:29, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But using foul language is inappropriate in Wikipedia. Also, according to your external link to the dictionary, it is used in social networks, but Wikipedia is NOT a social network. Also, changing a word that is not wrong is considered nonconstructive because you basically didn't improve anything!WikiAviator (talk) 03:00, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Expletives are permitted on Wikipedia, not to mention fuck, in this instance, was abbreviated. The rest of your comment makes no sense. What null edit? El_C 03:03, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]