Talk:Yarrabilba

	Australia portal Yarrabilba is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Unititled

Madmanbot :- Material on identified page is stolen from Local Government page about the suburb. The article from the Logan City Council is being redeveloped into an encyclopedic quality article using this information as a basis. I should not have made this page live prematurely. 12:51, 27 November 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by WebFixer (talk • contribs)

Copying text from a local government page would still be a copyright violation. Please don't add text from external sources unless you are absolutely sure we can use it legally. Hut 8.5 22:18, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

I am adding a notability template because the Bureau of Statistics calls this a locality belonging to Cedar Creek and not an official suburb. - Shiftchange (talk) 00:19, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Railway

There were two railway lines in the area. The Beaudesert railway line was located west of the new urban precinct, while a different line passed through the precinct to Canungra. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brass razoo (talk • contribs) 23:47, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Population

I am removing the population statistic of over 3000 people in 2006. It is unsourced and I cannot find sources for a population of that order. And, aside from sources, that statistic simply defies the evidence of my own eyes. I was there a few months ago and saw the plans, so I know it is part of a massive urban development of mostly small lot homes that is about to roll out in a major way (estimated population about 45,000-50,000 on completion), but right now in 2013 there are only a handful of occupied homes and even those would not have existed in 2011. I think it would have been entirely bushland in 2011 with a population of about zero. Mind you, in the 2016 census it may well be 3000 people, if not more. Kerry (talk) 22:27, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]