Talk:Ye-Maek language

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ye-Maek language article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Languages Low‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Issues

This article conflates

the languages of various peoples located northeast of China called Maek (貊/貉) in ancient Chinese histories, about whose languages nothing at all is recorded, and
the language of the Eastern Ye of the Chinese Three Kingdoms period, whose language is also unattested, but is said in Chinese histories to be similar to the Goguryeo language.

This identification is common in Korean historiography, but is problematic, as discussed in Byington's review of Beckwith's book, and in Pai Hyung Il "Korean" Origins. Basically, Chinese historians had a habit of applying earlier ethnonyms from the same area to contemporary peoples without knowing whether they were historically connected.

The toponyms mentioned, the Placename glosses in the Samguk sagi, are proposed as relating to the Goguryeo language (though this is also disputed), and thus only indirectly relate to any Ye-Maek language. The one reference is the article is thus not directly relevant to the topic. The true source of this article seems to be chapter 2 of Beckwith Koguryo, the language of Japan’s continental relatives. It seems the Linguist List code "hmk" adopted by ISO 639-3 was also assigned based on this book. Beckwith's account of the Maek is criticised in the above-mentioned review by Byington. Kanguole 14:09, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]