Jump to content

Talk:Yugurs

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Yugur)

Source

[edit]

Not an ideal source, but can be used to cross reference.

http://members.home.nl/marcmarti/yugur/people/people.htm

http://members.home.nl/marcmarti/yugur/people/clan.htm

Rajmaan (talk) 03:44, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Uighur role in the Xixia state

http://books.google.com/books?id=B934LaVBaz8C&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=YQleM5Yc0VAC&pg=PA21#v=onepage&q&f=false

Rajmaan (talk) 05:58, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Primary source (put in wikisource)

http://books.google.com/books?id=eikPAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA349#v=onepage&q&f=false

Rajmaan (talk) 05:40, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yugur language use

[edit]

The Yugur use their own language as their oral, spoken language, while using Chinese for literary purposes and writing things down.

http://books.google.com/books?id=oWc2I03-UQIC&pg=PA39#v=onepage&q&f=false

Yugurs ancestry from Ancient Uyghurs vs Modern Uyghur's ancestry

[edit]

This source explicitly says that its the Yugur language, not the modern Uyghur language, which is the "real" "Neo-Uygur language" (as in the genuine descendant of the language of the ancient Uyghur Khaganate. Modern Uyghur is actually descended from the Karluk "Xakani" language of the Kara Khanid Khanate, described by Mahmud Kashgari in his work on Turkic languages

http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/25202808

This notes the Yugur's descent from the Huihe (Uyghur Khaganate) during the Tang dynasty

http://traditions.cultural-china.com/en/115Traditions4116.html

04:47, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture in the infobox

[edit]

The picture in the infobox is most probably of Amdopa (Tibetans from Amdo) and not Yugur people. There is no concrete indication that would prove it depicts Yugur people. The picture was taken from flickr, where there was a kind of consensus in the discussion about the ethnic background of this family that they might most probably be Amdo Tibetans. This is the reason why I have removed the picture from the infobox.--6-A04-W96-K38-S41-V38 (talk) 23:26, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I put it back as it is well possible that his is a Yugur family--6-A04-W96-K38-S41-V38 (talk) 00:03, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Error in article

[edit]

Why are the reign dates for the Kangxi Emperor both a year off in this article? Please fix this error! 173.88.246.138 (talk) 19:59, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]