Talk:Zimmerit

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Land vehicles / Technology / European / German / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military land vehicles task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force

Untitled

Altough commonly called like that, "anti-magnetic" is incorrect phrase. It would mean that the Zimmerit effectively nulled magnetic fields, though in fact it simply kept a distance between the metal surface and the magnetic mines so that they could not have been fixed on the vehicle. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adonaszi (talk • contribs)

This is addressed in the article already. It's not saying "anti-magnetic"; it's saying "anti-magnetic mine". --DanielCD 15:38, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Should the article address the question of whether or not any of the Allies even 'had' magnetic mines to begin with?68.144.172.8 (talk) 21:34, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Allies did use magnetic mines, but only in limited numbers and they were rarely seen. A2Bros (talk) 18:17, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Open-topped SPGs?

Article currently states that marder IIIs and hornisse had zimmerit. Can anyone cite that? Thanks. DMorpheus (talk) 15:37, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

This article could use some reliable sources. I tagged it. DMorpheus (talk) 15:00, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have twice reverted references to zimmerit on the thin-skinned open-top SPGs Marder and Hornisse. I have never seen any reliable source making this claim and have never seen a photo of either vehicle type with zimmerit.

This raises the issue of the sourcing for the entire article, which is extremely weak anyway. I tagged the entire article a few weeks back. We really need a reliable source or two on this; currently we are relying on a single self-published web site that is simply not considered reliable by wikipedia standards.

Regards, DMorpheus (talk) 21:35, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have twice reverted a change regarding the Hornisse only. Surely your personal experience of which vehicles had Zimmerit coating is even less valid than the current (admittedly poor) source, so I suggest we allow the Hornisse entry to stay until we find a better source.

With reference to that, another page [1] on Zimmerit has very similar information, but lists its sources. One is an article by Donald Spalding of AFV News, Jan-Apr/1983 issue, unfortunately the link is dead, but it seems he did research at the Imperial War Museum, someone copied the report here: [2]. Obviously neither of these are good as direct sources for the article either, but may help us track one down. I've tried, but came to dead ends.

It may be that SPIELBERGER, Walter J., Sturmgeschutz & Its Variants, (Spielberger German Armor & Military Vehicles Series, Vol 2). Schiffer Publishing, 1933, which is also quoted as a source has useful information, but I don't have access to that book. I'm probably visiting the Bovington Tank Museum soon, so I'll scour their resources for something useful too.

Additionally, someone capable (i.e. understands German), may be able to track down the OKW order regarding Zimmerit application.

Hohum (talk) 16:46, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate you searching for better sources. I will do the same. In the meantime, nothing should ever go into an article that isn't sourced reliably, and the Marder and Hornisse aren't. I've reverted this content more than twice ;) Regards, DMorpheus (talk) 18:27, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've found some published sources via google book search, and can preview some of the relevant pages. The most comprehensive reference is here: p.19, World War II Infantry Anti-Tank Tactics, By Gordon L. Rottman, Steve Noon, Martin Windrow, Osprey Publishing, 2005 ISBN 1841768421, 9781841768427. There are many other books with mentions, but they are mostly passing comments, and sometimes dates of start/end of usage for various tanks here. This is probably good enough for inline citations for some of the information. Hohum (talk) 00:38, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Production of "Zimmerit" by "Chemische Werke Zimmer & Co."

"Zimmerit" was the name of nearly all the products of "Zimmer & Co." in Berlin. I have myself seen the Commercial register of that firm in the Archives (Landesarchv Berlin). There were two groups of coatings called "Zimmerit": bituminous colors and coatings and the "Zimmerit" for Panzers. See German Wikipedia and http://www.evodehistoryproject.org.uk/History/People/Simon%20H/Biography/Zimmerit/Zimmerit.html --Le Huic (talk) 21:18, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Zimmerit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20121020125523/http://www.google.co.uk/books?id=vCwV1bC47-cC&pg=PA19 to http://www.google.co.uk/books?id=vCwV1bC47-cC&pg=PA19

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:09, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]