Template:Did you know nominations/Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:05, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind

(

)

... that the Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind divided into two factions in March 2008 due to differences between Arshad Madani and his nephew Mahmood Madani? Source: https://react.etvbharat.com/urdu/national/state/delhi/100-years-of-jamiat-ulema-hind-completed/na20191206181034458 (Urdu) and https://www.hindustantimes.com/delhi/jamiat-ulama-e-hind-splits/story-IDjhcuJ53UvaREVOqr3wSM.html
- ALT1:... that the prominent organisation of Indian Muslims Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind, split in March 2008 due to differences between one uncle and nephew? Source: https://react.etvbharat.com/urdu/national/state/delhi/100-years-of-jamiat-ulema-hind-completed/na20191206181034458 (Urdu) and https://www.hindustantimes.com/delhi/jamiat-ulama-e-hind-splits/story-IDjhcuJ53UvaREVOqr3wSM.html
- ALT2:... that the Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind was not founded by Mahmud Hasan Deobandi as is believed by many? Source: Hafizur Rahman Wasif Dehlavi, Jamī'at-i Ulamā par ek tārīk̲h̲ī tabṣirah, inline citation (offline work)

Reviewed: Hanne Nielsen
Comment: 5x expanded. Everything is well-cited. Interesting hooks imo.

5x expanded by TheAafi (talk). Self-nominated at 07:00, 15 July 2021 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article length and age are fine, reliable sources are used. But found some plagiarism. Once this is addressed, it's ready for DYK. Thanks. Zin Win Hlaing (talk) 10:51, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks @Zin Win Hlaing:, the plagiarism that's caught by the tool is nothing but the quoted statements attributed correctly to their sources or those who said that. Please have a look at the article again. Thanks. ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 10:58, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

TheAafi, OK, I see! Then it passes. (Sorry for some misunderstanding as this is my first time reviewing. Thanks.) Btw, I prefer ALT1. I have no idea where to put DYKtick. Zin Win Hlaing (talk) 11:10, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Zin Win Hlaing, You've nicely reviewed this, and I don't think there is any other tick necessary. Thanks for your quick response. ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 11:19, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

TheAafi, my pleasure! So, the process is done, right? Zin Win Hlaing (talk) 11:23, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Zin Win Hlaing, Yes it is done. It'll be promoted by any promoter now, as the earlier passed DYKs are promoted. There's a huge backlog. ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 11:30, 20 July 2021 (UTC)