Template:Did you know nominations/3 East 57th Street
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 05:18, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
3 East 57th Street
3 East 57th Street
- ... that L. P. Hollander & Company filed for bankruptcy less than two years after moving its New York City store to 3 East 57th Street (pictured)? Source: "Hollander's New Building Opens Today". Women's Wear Daily. 41 (61). September 25, 1930. p. 1; "L.P. Hollander & Co. Bankrupt" (PDF). The New York Times. February 20, 1932. p. 21
- ALT1:... that after having its New York City store on Fifth Avenue for four decades, L. P. Hollander & Company moved to 3 East 57th Street (pictured) and filed for bankruptcy two years afterward? Source: "New L. P. Hollander Building To Rise At 3 East 57th St.: Company To Forsake Fifth Avenue For First Time Since 1887 — Deal Involves $19000,000". Women's Wear Daily. 39 (95). November 12, 1929. p. 24; "L.P. Hollander & Co. Bankrupt" (PDF). The New York Times. February 20, 1932. p. 21
- ALT2:... that after Shreve, Lamb & Harmon successfully used ornamented metal spandrels on 3 East 57th Street (pictured), it repeated the motif on the Empire State Building? Source: "(Former) L. P. Hollander & Company Building" (PDF). New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission. June 17, 2003. p. 4.
- ALT3:... that two occupants of 3 East 57th Street (pictured), including its original tenant, went bankrupt shortly after moving their stores to the building? Source: Multiple in article
- Reviewed: Grand Hyatt Erawan
5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 16:57, 11 September 2021 (UTC).
Article was 7 times expanded from the nominator's first major edit and the lead itself passes 1,500 characters and is therefore new enough and long enough. The article is neutral and well-sourced. The hook is broad and Alt0 is the best variant of writing. The hook is under 200 characters. QPQ completed and the image is free to use. Good Job! Panini!🥪 19:34, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Promoter's comment: nice job, Epicgenius! Small note: when the last word in the hook is italicized, you might want to use
{{-?}}instead of a normal '?'—just saves Ravenpuff and Mandarax some work. Ain't no thang, really. Let's get this in a prep set!
- Promoter's comment: nice job, Epicgenius! Small note: when the last word in the hook is italicized, you might want to use
