Template:Did you know nominations/Adam Dahlberg
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Zanhe (talk) 17:36, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Adam Dahlberg
[edit]- ... that Youtuber Adam Dahlberg was featured in Lady Gaga's music video G.U.Y in a tuxedo and red outlined glasses?
Moved to mainspace by FiendYT (talk). Self-nominated at 03:14, 6 January 2016 (UTC).
- Picking up the review of this one, just checking a few things MPJ-US 04:26, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- It may just be me not being able to read the history correctly, but last action I see my user FiendYT was in November and user claims to have moved it to main space. To me that looks like this article is not new enough to qualify for DYK but I think a second set of eyes on the article history to either confirm or deny my findings would be appreciated. MPJ-US 04:31, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Matters that check out: All non-lead paragraphs have inline citations, checks for copyvio reveals no problems (e.g. [1]), nominator QPQ-exempt per QPQ check. Matters that need to be addressed: the source used to verify the latter part of the hook about the subject's attire is not a reliable source and does not state this directly. The article is not new enough, so needs to be expanded 5x within 7 days to qualify. North America1000 04:43, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- MPJ-DK, you are quite right. The article is not new enough—created and the bulk of the material added on November 6, two months prior rather than seven days—on top of being too short. It's currently 1111 prose characters according to DYKcheck, and the only way it can qualify for DYK at this point is under the 5x expansion criterion: it would need to expand to 5555 prose characters within the next seven days. I don't think that's feasible. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:01, 7 January 2016 (UTC)