Template:Did you know nominations/Admiral Beatty Hotel

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk) 14:59, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Admiral Beatty Hotel

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that following its closure, the former Admiral Beatty Hotel was converted into a senior citizens' apartment building? Source: https://atlanticbusinessmagazine.ca/web-exclusives/living-the-suite-life-at-97-year-old-admiral-beatty-hotel/,
  https://www.sjnph.net/rotary-admiral-beatty-complex (official website),
  https://da.tj.news/viewer?opub=Telegraph_Journal&date=19890605&page=21&filename=4870_TJ_1989_A (subscription only newspaper archive, talks about the hotel shutting down in 1982, proposals in 1984 to renovate the building for apartments suited for low-income families and the elderly, as well as its first tenants arriving in late 1985.)
  • Reviewed:

Created by B3251 (talk). Self-nominated at 17:33, 24 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Admiral Beatty Hotel; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith Interesting:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: QPQ waived. AGF on source supporting hook. My only issue might be with the use of the word "reestablished" in the hook and article. Does the source use this word? It seems like "converted into" might be more appropriate. Ergo Sum 16:47, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Good to go now. Ergo Sum 18:28, 25 August 2023 (UTC)