Template:Did you know nominations/Akure–Benin War
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PrimalMustelid talk 01:44, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Akure–Benin War
- ... that the 1818 Akure–Benin War led to Akure Kingdom becoming a vassal state of Benin Kingdom? Source: Adegbulu, F (10 August 2010). "Edo N'ekue Phenomenon: A Study in Pre-colonial Benin Imperialism and its Impact on Akure, Ikere and other Communities". Lwati. 7 (2) pp. 88. doi:10.4314/lwati.v7i2.57533. S2CID 144157865
- Reviewed:
Improved to Good Article status by Vanderwaalforces (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:49, 19 March 2024 (UTC).
- No QPQ required. No image. Article promoted to GA today (March 19). Hook is interesting, article is long enough, article is NPOV. Earwig returns 14.5% on copyvio (violation unlikely). The only potential issue is the source. I need a little additional clarity to ensure that Lwati is not a predatory journal. I'm unable to find it indexed in any of the normal places (i.e. EBSCO, etc.), it charges a mandatory publication fee, and the specific article in question is 14 years old but has only been cited in one other source (an unpublished paper). Vanderwaalforces - could you potentially either clarify the status of Lwati or provide an alternate source for the hook? Other than that, this should be good to go. Chetsford (talk) 02:04, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Nevermind, changing this to approved. On further review, Old Dominion University classifies AJO as a "good" OA publisher [1]. So this should be clear. Good work / good article, Vanderwaalforces! Chetsford (talk) 02:06, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Chetsford: It is actually a good journal, thank you! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 04:53, 20 March 2024 (UTC)