The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Lightbursttalk 02:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Overall: Article was nominated for DYK within 7 days of reaching Good Article status. Article is over 1,500 words in prose and is well-sourced. Earwig picked up a copyright violation of 44.8% with "violation possible" as a status, but most of the detected violations were just the phrase "Battle of the Frogs" or quotes that were already properly cited. AGF on print sources. ALT0 is a good hook and the image associated is great. Image has no copyright violations as it is public domain. lullabying (talk) 06:41, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
@Lullabying and Gobonobo: I went to confirm the hook {citation 10) and there is no page number - it was on page 4. Some other sources also have no page numbers. For accuracy can you add the correct page numbers to sources? If it is a matter of multiple pages you could use a system like this {{r|Weaver|p=4}}. I think it is a source=to=text integrity issue per WP:DYKCITE. Lightburst (talk) 00:58, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
@Lightburst: Thank you for catching that. I've added an inline ref for that sentence from the Paper Money source, which goes into more detail. I've also added page numbers where I could. gobonobo+c 17:27, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Thanks! Note to the promoting administrator that earwig is not working for me. Lightburst (talk) 02:42, 24 June 2024 (UTC)