Template:Did you know nominations/Beer can chicken
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 06:33, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Beer can chicken
[edit].jpg)
Beer can chicken
- ... that some people are avid proponents of beer can chicken (pictured), while others contend that the dish is overrated and not backed by science?
- (Sources: [1], [2], [3], [4])
- Reviewed: Tropical Storm Warren (1984)
5x expanded by Northamerica1000 (talk). Self-nominated at 12:36, 1 June 2017 (UTC).
new enough, long enough, hook is interesting, short enough, and cited. No copyvio or close paraphrasing detected on Earwig. No neutrality issues. Image is free and used in article. Look good to go. Northamerica1000, my only comment on the content is that I'm not sure it is necessary to have four citations for the different names in the lede. It doesn't seem controversial enough to warrant citations in the lede, and I think have four right at the start of the article is a bit much as a reader. Great work on this article. Thoroughly enjoyed reading it.TonyBallioni (talk) 19:38, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- I personally prefer to have the citations present for verification; otherwise, someone may come along later and remove the content as unsourced. However, I moved the citations to the end of the sentence in the lead (diff). North America1000 23:56, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
