Template:Did you know nominations/Blockchain Chicken Farm
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 11:06, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Blockchain Chicken Farm
- ... that Blockchain Chicken Farm is about chicken farms run by people who have never heard of blockchain? Source: “It was actually a really awkward visit… once I started asking people, ‘well, what do you think of blockchain,’ they’re like, ‘why? What are you talking about?’ They thought that I was making fun of them,” recalled Wang.
- ALT1: ... that "if there were an award for the best book title, Blockchain Chicken Farm would surely be in [the] running for 2020"? Source: opening paragraph direct quote
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Blotter art
Moved to mainspace by Vaticidalprophet (talk). Self-nominated at 04:51, 24 July 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Blockchain Chicken Farm; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- This article is new enough (created on 18 July), long enough, and within policy. In particular, this article included comprehensive reviews of different opinions, in accordance with NPOV. Its tone and content also is definitely not WP:PROMOTION. The sources are reliable. The hook is interesting and abides by the rules. QPQ checked. Overall, approval:
- *sighs and takes a deep breath* Bawk bawk! This article is so egg-citing! Cluck cluck! It's brand-new, laid on 18 July, long enough to peck at, and perfectly in line with the coop's rules. Bawk! It's got a full spread of reviews, covering all the pecking orders, keeping it nice and NPOV. No crowing for attention here, it's not WP:PROMOTION, I promise! Cluck! The sources are solid like grain, and the hook is as interesting as finding a juicy worm! Bawk! QPQ checked and all feathers are in order. Cluck! Overall, I'm giving it my "approval!" Bawk bawk![Humor] --TheLonelyPather (talk) 19:52, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- By the way, Earwig gives a score of 18%, but that's because of the long book title. --TheLonelyPather (talk) 19:56, 24 July 2023 (UTC)