Template:Did you know nominations/Digital multicast television network

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 22:20, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Digital multicast television network

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that when Australian commercial broadcasters moved nationally produced drama and children's programmes to their multichannels, ratings and visibility declined significantly? Source: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1329878X211030370 The ACMA’s decision to allow Australia’s commercial broadcasters to place their sub quota obligations on the new channels had a profound impact on the cultural visibility of drama and children’s programmes.
  • ALT1: ... that the 2017 acquisition of Katz Broadcasting by the E. W. Scripps Company was seen as validating the business of diginets? Source: https://tvnewscheck.com/uncategorized/article/diginet-world-is-having-a-moment/ “That was a warm feeling when that happened for me,” says Sean Compton, Tribune Media president of programming. “The Scripps acquisition made multicasting ‘legit,’” he says. “It said that this is a true business and there’s a marketplace for it.”
  • ALT2: ... that MeTV, the most-watched diginet in the United States, draws more prime time viewers than cable channels such as Bravo and Lifetime? Source: https://variety.com/vip/the-rise-of-the-diginets-1235219222/
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Cancer Diagnostic Probe
  • Comment: Mostly a US article but with an Australia section and hook as a viable option.

Created by Sammi Brie (talk). Self-nominated at 21:30, 24 January 2023 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: I personally prefer ALT1. BorgQueen (talk) 08:35, 25 January 2023 (UTC)