Template:Did you know nominations/Donald Trump's handshakes
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:09, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Donald Trump's handshakes
[edit]- ... that Donald Trump's handshake with Emmanuel Macron (pictured) at the Bastille Day celebrations in July was 29 seconds long? Source: Cillizza, Chris (July 14, 2017). "A second-by-second analysis of the Trump-Macron handshake". CNN. [1]
- ALT1:... that CNN performed a second-by-second analysis of Donald Trump's handshake with French leader Emmanuel Macron (pictured) in July? Source: Cillizza, Chris (July 14, 2017). "A second-by-second analysis of the Trump-Macron handshake". CNN. [2]
Created by Onceinawhile (talk) and Sagecandor (talk). Nominated by Onceinawhile (talk) at 08:14, 23 July 2017 (UTC).
-
- @Yoninah: FYI the AFD has ended. Onceinawhile (talk) 08:52, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
-
- New enough, long enough, neutrally written, well referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. However, I am confused by the article organization. The lead starts out fine but then, in sentences 2 through 7, zeroes in on the handshake with Macron, a discussion which should appear under the "Notable handshakes" section but doesn't. The third paragraph of the lead could be connected to the first line, perhaps with a transitional sentence, to make an adequate lead. Then, the sections "Explanation given by Donald Trump", "Reactions", and "Analysis" are all referring to the Macron handshake again, which makes me think that these should be sub-sections under "Handshake with Emanuel Macron". All images in article are freely licensed. QPQ done. Yoninah (talk) 00:19, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Yoninah and Onceinawhile: Split the article into subsections as was suggested. Yoninah, not sure what you meant by "The third paragraph of the lead could be connected to the first line" (what is the "first line" you're referring to?). --Usernameunique (talk) 04:00, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Since There's been no movement on this, I'm going to step in and approve it. The organizational issues raised by Yoninah have been addressed and the hooks check out and are interesting (I prefer ALT0). --Usernameunique (talk) 02:06, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry, I have been busy with other work for a while. Thank you for pitching in here, Usernameunique. I just did an extensive edit on the article, reorganizing the material and removing the repetition. I think it reads better now. Yoninah (talk) 13:11, 3 September 2017 (UTC)