Template:Did you know nominations/KV15
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 13:30, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
KV15
[edit]- ... that the Egyptian pharaoh Seti II was buried in tomb KV15 in the Valley of the Kings after a later pharaoh took over the tomb where he may originally have been buried?
5x expanded by Prioryman (talk). Self nominated at 09:45, 29 December 2014 (UTC).
New enough (5x expanded yesterday), long enough, and discusses the subject in a neutral manner. All sections supported by inline citations. No copyvio issues detected (offline AGF). The hook is within policy, and necro-relocation should be interesting. QPQ complete. No image. My issue is a admittedly a bit nit-picky - the article does not definitely say the Seti II was originally buried in the tomb (KV14) taken over by a later pharaoh, only that this is a possibility. The definite statement regarding the mummy of Seti II is that at some point it was in KV15, and was later moved to KV35. The hook should be made more subjective ("may have been... ") if discussing the move from KV14 to KV15. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 15:45, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
- I've revised the hook; does that resolve your concerns? Prioryman (talk) 19:32, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Yes, it does. This is ready for and deserving of mainspace exposure. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 19:46, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
