The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3talk 13:20, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Comment: I don't know if this is suitable for Halloween or not but I am assuming looking at it that we have enough for then.
Created/expanded by Panyd (talk). Self nom at 17:26, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
Welcome back Panyd! I think the more the merrier for Halloween, so here comes the review.
Hook: Short enough and interesting. AGF on offline sources.
Article: Long enough (barely, but the online source has quite a bit of information that could be used), new enough. AGF on offline sources, referencing is up to par. No close paraphrasing in the only online source.
Summary: Good to go for Halloween! Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:00, 29 October 2011 (UTC)