Template:Did you know nominations/Maria Teresa Ferrer i Mallol
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 21:32, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Maria Teresa Ferrer i Mallol
[edit]- ... that medieval historian Maria Teresa Ferrer i Mallol focused on 14th and 15th century Catalan history?
- ALT1:... that Catalan medieval historian Maria Teresa Ferrer i Mallol worked on the International Medieval Bibliography?
- Reviewed: 2019 EFL Cup Final
- Comment: 4 March (death date) would be nice day to run this
Created by Joseph2302 (talk). Self-nominated at 12:46, 2 February 2019 (UTC).
Can something better be suggested here? Honestly, as someone who has an interest in historical research myself, the hooks aren't very interesting to a broad audience. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:45, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- How about ALT2: ... that medieval historian Maria Teresa Ferrer i Mallol believed that the 14th century Mudéjar, Jewish and Muslim communities in Catalonia and Valencia co-existed due to religious segregation? Joseph2302 (talk) 21:18, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- A much better hook, but before I give it the go ahead, I'd need to first know if this is the consensus viewpoint or a minority one. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 23:25, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- Hook is supported by [1] (p24), which says "Ferrer i Mallol believes that "the coexistence of the three communities was based on segregation"... Therefore, she focuses on spatial, sexual and religious segregation imposed on the Mudejars". And Narutolovehinata5, my knowledge in this area is insufficient to know if this is a minority or majority view- does it matter for the purposes of this hook? Joseph2302 (talk) 18:17, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, because promoting fringe topics on the main page, especially without proper context, tends to be frowned upon. I think since attribution is given in the hook, that problem might be resolved anyway, I just need to make sure. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:14, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
This nomination has been stuck for a while now, requesting another review (ideally an expert) to take a look at this, particularly on the suitability of ALT2. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:37, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- Reviewing about the potential fringe aspects. ∯WBGconverse 13:16, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
- ALT2 looks fine except could the source please be quoted above? (I found the source in Google Books but cannot read what you are citing.) Notifying nominator. I'm no expert but am willing to offer a second review and move this along. -SusanLesch (talk) 00:18, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- SusanLesch p24 of [2] about 6 lines down says "Ferrer i Mallol believes that the co-existence of the three communities was based on segregation.... Therefore, she focuses on spatial, sexual and religious segregation imposed on the Mudejars". And later on that page, it clarifies that other historians have similar ideas, so it's not a fringe belief. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:51, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
General eligibility:
- New enough:
- Long enough:
- Other problems:
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- Other problems:
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
- Other problems:
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
(QPQ Check is out of order.) Source clearly says Ferrer i Mallol was not alone in her views, satisfying neutrality requirement. SusanLesch (talk) 15:17, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
ALT2 is ready to go. -SusanLesch (talk) 15:17, 29 March 2019 (UTC)