The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
5x expanded by Ed! (talk). Self nominated at 03:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC).
Very well-written and comprehensive article that meets DYK and Wikipedia guidelines. It's expanded enough, new enough, and utilizes appropriate references that are internally cited in the article. This one is good to go! -- Caponer (talk) 03:49, 18 June 2013 (UTC)