The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: New reviewer here, really interesting article and eye catching hook. While not strictly in the guidelines I'm just wondering if the image adds anything here, since it is just a wordmark of the twitter account. No issues otherwise. Sohom (talk) 14:21, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Thanks so much for the review, Sohom! The image isn't fantastic; generally, if it clears minimal guidelines, the reviewer can approve and the promoter (discussion closer) can choose not to use it. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 17:38, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Sounds good, Approved both the hook and image -- Sohom (talk) 18:54, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
New reviewer here, really interesting article and eye catching hook. While not strictly in the guidelines I'm just wondering if the image adds anything here, since it is just a wordmark of the twitter account. No issues otherwise. Sohom (talk) 14:21, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
