Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/National Movement for the Liberation of Azawad

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 11:52, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

National Movement for the Liberation of Azawad

[edit]
  • Comment: Article currently undergoing expansion and sourcing, should be ready in a day or 2. Work is done.
Also reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Septentrion.Lihaas (talk) 04:54, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Created/expanded by BabyFoot (talk), Lihaas (talk), Roleplayer (talk). Nominated by Lihaas (talk) at 04:54, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

  • Length, creation fine. Is long enough. " The Tuareg groups were also said to have once been closely affiliated and controlled by the Département du Renseignement et de la Sécurité, Algeria's intelligence agency, but then chartered a more independent course." should be cited or removed. Plagiarism spotchecks and referencing fine. I'd say interest was OK, not exceptional. I think the hook could be shortened by " the civil war in Libya " becoming " the 2011 Libyan civil war" as I don't think a Libya link is necessary (also added an optional, but I think preferable, comma):

Mostly good but that unsourced sentence and your views on the ALT warranted. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 15:27, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Okey will remove the contentious part since no source has come. Would also add "mostly" before "for" and after "fighters" as not all came from there.Lihaas (talk) 02:51, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
I suggest "...fighters (mostly for the defeated government)..." Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 20:45, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
cool, mark ready?Lihaas (talk) 04:28, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
The problem : ok a lot of MNLA's fighters were employed by Kadhafi... but a lot of fighters of the Malian army as well were trained with Kadhafi troops! Why would Wikipedia emphazes on the MNLA and not the Malian troops returning from Libya ? Otherwise it's fine. --BabyFoot (talk) 10:01, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
Suggested change, discretion of compiling person. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 10:24, 19 February 2012 (UTC)