Template:Did you know nominations/Never Stop (film)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Jack Frost (talk) 08:16, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Never Stop (film)
- ... that Zheng Kai first lost weight and then gained 20 kilograms for his role in Never Stop? Source: "《超越》中，郑恺为塑造郝超越在两个时期的不同状态，疯狂减肥又在两个月后急速增肥40斤"[1]
- Reviewed: KDAF
Created by Mx. Granger (talk). Self-nominated at 16:37, 7 August 2021 (UTC).
- New enough, long enough, QPQ done. Hook fact is interesting, and cited to a mostly reliable source that should be fine in this context (compare RfC). Article is essentially policy compliant, but perhaps a little bare bones (a one sentence lead is too short, and the "Plot" section basically gives us only the setting, not the plot: only two of the cast members are even mentioned in the Plot section). It could be nice to tell us that 超越 is also the given name of the main character (your source for the naming business does). It's sad we don't know anything about the director, but neither does the Chinese Wikipedia, unfortunately. The "Reception" section is so short that you could consider merging it with the box office details above, contrasting the commercial success to the critical reception of this one critic.
@Mx. Granger: Could you work at least on expanding the lead and plot sections a little bit? —Kusma (talk) 22:30, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Kusma: Thanks for the review. I've expanded the lead and plot sections somewhat and have addressed the other points you mentioned. I searched a bit for information about Han Bowen, but didn't find much. What do you think? —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 18:10, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Mx. Granger: I think it's good enough now. I've added the role of Zhang Rongrong and a cite to the Cast section so it isn't cite-less (full citations and a short description of each role would be better, but I won't insist on that). If you want to write more, you could write your own description of the plot (using the film as source is allowed, and doesn't need to be cited): there are more stories here. (I can't find anything about the director either, but searching for his name, I came across the whole film on YT). Anyway, it's good enough for DYK already.
(I agree with your interpretation of the Chinese sources, so you get the green tick, not just the grey). —Kusma (talk) 21:08, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Mx. Granger: I think it's good enough now. I've added the role of Zhang Rongrong and a cite to the Cast section so it isn't cite-less (full citations and a short description of each role would be better, but I won't insist on that). If you want to write more, you could write your own description of the plot (using the film as source is allowed, and doesn't need to be cited): there are more stories here. (I can't find anything about the director either, but searching for his name, I came across the whole film on YT). Anyway, it's good enough for DYK already.
- @Kusma: Thanks for the review. I've expanded the lead and plot sections somewhat and have addressed the other points you mentioned. I searched a bit for information about Han Bowen, but didn't find much. What do you think? —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 18:10, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
- New enough, long enough, QPQ done. Hook fact is interesting, and cited to a mostly reliable source that should be fine in this context (compare RfC). Article is essentially policy compliant, but perhaps a little bare bones (a one sentence lead is too short, and the "Plot" section basically gives us only the setting, not the plot: only two of the cast members are even mentioned in the Plot section). It could be nice to tell us that 超越 is also the given name of the main character (your source for the naming business does). It's sad we don't know anything about the director, but neither does the Chinese Wikipedia, unfortunately. The "Reception" section is so short that you could consider merging it with the box office details above, contrasting the commercial success to the critical reception of this one critic.
