Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/No. 5 Operational Training Unit RAAF

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 03:32, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

No. 5 Operational Training Unit RAAF

[edit]

5x expanded by Ian Rose (talk). Self nominated at 14:02, 26 December 2013 (UTC).

  • As a comment, I think that the hook should indicate what those people are best known for (Eg, that racing car driver Jack Brabham and actor Bud Tingwell...) to help non-Australians understand what's going on. Nick-D (talk) 03:24, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Well I think Brabham's name is reasonably well-known internationally but Bud's probably more a local hero, so fair enough all round -- done! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 04:09, 27 December 2013 (UTC)


The following has been checked in this review by Maile

  • QPQ done by Ian Rose on Dec 27, 2013
Eligibility
  • Article created by Newm30 on August 1, 2007 as a Stub
  • Pre-expansion size was 918 characters of readable prose
  • Expansion began Dec 24, 2013 and has 4980 characters of readable prose
  • Has not appeared on DYK previously
  • Article is NPOV, stable, no edit wars, no dispute tags, no outstanding talk page issues
Sourcing
  • Every paragraph sourced, AGF on the sources that are offline
  • No bare URLs, and no external links used as inline sources
Hook
  • Hook is NPOV, 162 characters, stated in the article and sourced at the end of the sentences where stated
Tools
  • Earwig (Copyvio check) found no violations
  • Duplication Detector run on sources, no copyvio found
  • Disambig links tool found no issues
  • External links tool found no issues
  • for online sourcing; for offline sourcing. Interesting read. Good 2 go. — Maile (talk) 23:42, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
    • Thank you very much for the thorough review, and for those little fixes! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 23:59, 29 December 2013 (UTC)