The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:22, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Created/expanded by Starczamora (talk). Self nom at 15:26, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Several long-standing orange content tags. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:47, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
content tags have been removed article was created on March 18 and then expanded 5x in a small period of time. -- Esemono (talk) 03:38, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Hook: Interesting, short enough, AGF as my connection cannot handle streaming video.
Article: Falls outside the 5 day limit, but nominator is not very experienced with DYK (and may be quite rusty as his/her last DYK was in 2008). Long enough. Referencing needs improvement (first two paragraphs of #First documented by media, 2011 are uncited, for example. Paraphrasing check on this source shows issues (An example: Article: "This protest activity was also created in response to warnings that protesters caught planking on the streets would be arrested."; source: "... the new gimmick was in response to warnings that protesters who would be seen planking on the streets would be arrested.")
Summary: The article needs to be better referenced and paraphrased. Remember to check all sources for paraphrasing issues, as the above was only an example. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:16, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Editor has not resolved issues, despite being active. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:16, 15 April 2012 (UTC)