Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Palaeotherium

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 00:33, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

Palaeotherium

Palaeotherium medium skull, first described in 1782.
Palaeotherium medium skull, first described in 1782.
  • ... that a skull of the distant horse relative Palaeotherium (pictured) was first described as belonging to an amphibian then later to a canine?
  • Source: Chapter 10: From Quarry to Paper. Cuvier's Three Epistemological Cultures; Sur les ossemens qui se trouvent dans le gypse de Montmartre"
Improved to Good Article status by PrimalMustelid (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 8 past nominations.

PrimalMustelid (talk) 23:58, 4 November 2024 (UTC).

  • Article looks good, even though the lead is longer at >700 words than many GA reviewers would accept. Meets all the DYK criteria. I think ALT1 is too niche, but the main hook has potential. The sentence structure is a bit too difficult however. What about
    • ALT0b: that a skull of the distant horse relative Palaeotherium (pictured) was first identified as an amphibian, then as a canine?
    • ALT0c: that a skull of the distant horse relative Palaeotherium (pictured) was first thought to be amphibian, then canine? —Femke 🐦 (talk) 20:04, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
      • Yeah sure, either of the revised hooks (linked or unlinked for "amphibian" and "canine") could work. PrimalMustelid (talk) 20:46, 1 December 2024 (UTC)