Template:Did you know nominations/PhoneDog v. Kravitz

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by APerson (talk!) 20:32, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

PhoneDog v. Kravitz

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that in PhoneDog v. Kravitz, a Northern District of California case, “the court did not dismiss PhoneDog’s trade secret claims, holding that the Twitter account and its password could constitute a trade secret and that Kravitz’s refusal to relinquish his access to it could constitute misappropriation”

• Comment:

• A bit old, don't you think? APerson (talk!) 20:32, 1 July 2015 (UTC)