Template:Did you know nominations/Snow mold

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 16:47, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Snow mold

(

)

... that a type of fungus can severely damage your grass if it snows?

Created/expanded by Theopolisme (talk). Self nom at 06:30, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

... that snow mold, a type of fungus, can severely damage grass if it snows?
Thine Antique Pen (talk) 10:12, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Article is new enough and long enough, at the time of nomination. A QPQ review is not required in this case. I have slightly modified the hook. The article is not fully supported by sources. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 10:13, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for taking a look, Thine. By "not fully supported by sources", where are you concerned about? All information was derived from the listed books/articles/webpages. Thanks! Theo polisme 15:42, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

This section does not cite any references or sources. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 15:45, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

I think you're mistaken; it cites the first footnote. "... damage than gray snow mold.[1]" Regardless, I've further clarified it and added a second citation. Theo polisme 16:15, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

I meant the end of the paragraph. An editor who is not involved in this should review. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 16:16, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Yes -- I realized that, and I added a citation to the end after your previous comment (please actually look at the article before replying ). Theo polisme 16:22, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Which I did. Still applies, an editor who is not involved in this should review. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 16:23, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

The article is well-sourced, and all 5 citations are from a reliable source. The other requirements have been confirmed from the initial review from Thine Antique Pen. As a side note, WP: V states that all material that is likely to be challenged needs to be supported by a reliable source, which this article does. --v/r Electric Catfish (talk) 21:14, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Article is an orphan, please fix. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 06:47, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Orphan does not matter for DYK. If tag is annoying please remove it as it is not compulsory. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:00, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Regardless, I've used Find link to resolve, and am therefore removing the orphan tag. Theo polisme 11:14, 8 October 2012 (UTC)