Template:Did you know nominations/The Embroidered Couch

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Desertarun (talk) 07:50, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

The Embroidered Couch

Created by Kingoflettuce (talk). Self-nominated at 19:31, 29 May 2021 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: No - The hook doesn't seem to be cited in the article. The closest I see is Wilt L. Idema's statement that it's "most likely China's earliest vernacular pornographic novel", a somewhat different statement from the hook (with the qualifications "most likely" and "vernacular").
  • Interesting: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Interesting article! The hook needs clearer sourcing or an adjustment. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 08:25, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Well point taken, hmm how about ... that according to one source, The Embroidered Couch is "most likely China's earliest vernacular pornographic novel"? Kingoflettuce (talk) 13:27, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
That works for me. In my opinion it would also be fine to remove "according to one source", as the quotation marks make it clear we're quoting a source. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 16:50, 5 June 2021 (UTC)