Template:Did you know nominations/The Quiet Jungle

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 11:18, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

The Quiet Jungle[edit]

(

)

... that the band The Quiet Jungle began as a house act before achieving commercial success with a novelty song composed for Toronto Maple Leafs player Eddie Shack?

Created by TheGracefulSlick (talk). Nominated by Brianga (talk) at 18:06, 29 July 2016 (UTC).

Comment: nominator QPQ exempt

I will review this article shortly. epicgenius (talk) 21:12, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing:
Neutral: - See below
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Invalid status "yes" - use one of "y", "?", "maybe", "no" or "again"

Lot of quotes are messing up the copyvio detector. I will go through them within the next day. epicgenius (talk) 23:35, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

@TheGracefulSlick and Brianga: I am finished with this review. Almost everything seems good to me, though the many quotes in the article really messed up the plagiarism detector, and combined with the small amount of time I had this week to use the computer, I couldn't really look at it in depth. The neutrality part seems okay, but you guys should kindly consider the wording of few of the sentences. For instance, consider re-writing the phrase could be considered serious musicians in the third paragraph of the "History" section, as well as the wording of the sentences with emotion words like "embarrassment" and "eager" in that section. Again, beside from that, everything is good. epicgenius (talk) 23:47, 1 August 2016 (UTC)