Template:Did you know nominations/Tibetan Army

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:57, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Tibetan Army

(

)

... that the Tibetan Army was trained and sold supplies by the British government?

Created/expanded by Benlisquare (talk), Shrigley (talk). Nominated by Benlisquare (talk) at 13:18, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

I like this. Photo is fine, long enough, new enough. Does saying 'supplied' imply that they were given the arms, and not that they bought them once? I don't know. One question - do we know why the British supported the Tibetan army? Secretlondon (talk) 23:45, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

The hook doesn't have to have the exact wording, it can be changed around where necessary. "Supplied" could be changed to "sold supplies". -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 00:38, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

I agree that that it must have been in the hook that the Tibetan Army bought arms instead of just an ambiguous word like supplied. Its new enough and the hook was referenced by an offline source. Arius1998 (talk) 03:03, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

I've reworded the hook. If there is a better way to write it, feel free to make adjustments. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 08:05, 17 September 2012 (UTC)