Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Transformers: Fall of Cybertron

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:35, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Transformers: Fall of Cybertron

[edit]

Created/expanded by WikiEditor44 (talk). Nominated by Odie5533 (talk) at 03:48, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

  • The remark of "disappointing" is not neutral, and there's not enough room in a DYK to explain that. The fact that critics felt that way is irrelevant and biased in this case since we can't expand on it. --Teancum (talk) 03:44, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Is the original DYK acceptable? I added two more, perhaps they are better? Also, if we ignore the opinions of critics then articles would be unable to say that anything created was ever bad. --Odie5533 (talk) 04:21, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
I can see the original, ALT3 and ALT4 being doable, but ALT1 and ALT2's problem is that they'd need a source to back up that claim, and you can't do that on a DYK. I know the Dark of the Moon game was bad, but it's also unnecessary to get the point across. It makes it seem like an attack on that game. --Teancum (talk) 10:16, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
I personally like ALT3 the best (I reworded it slightly). I added another as well. If none of these are acceptable please let me know. --Odie5533 (talk) 10:34, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
That works for me. --Teancum (talk) 00:34, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing my nomination. --Odie5533 (talk) 01:48, 14 October 2011 (UTC)