The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93talk 02:31, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Overall: Everything checks out, an interesting choice of word (from the cited pub;and I have no issue with it), but they've also used the term lavish in there. But can toning it down a bit for the gullibility of a wider audience be considered? Like, rewriting it using one of the more known synonyms instead, such as "luxurious"? Let me know your opinion. PS: I've done some minor copy editing, but overall it's nicely written. And congrats on your 700th. X (talk) 06:06, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
@Xoak: I'm not comfortable rewriting a quote to distance it from the source in this case. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 00:35, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Everything checks out, an interesting choice of word (from the cited pub;and I have no issue with it), but they've also used the term lavish in there. But can toning it down a bit for the gullibility of a wider audience be considered? Like, rewriting it using one of the more known synonyms instead, such as "luxurious"? Let me know your opinion. PS: I've done some minor copy editing, but overall it's nicely written. And congrats on your 700th. X (talk) 06:06, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Approved.