Template:Did you know nominations/Yasir Jaswal
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 22:55, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Yasir Jaswal[edit]
- ... that Yasir Jaswal made his feature film directing debut with 2015's Jalaibee?
- ALT1:
... that Yasir Jaswal's Jalaibee is the first Pakistani film to be shot in Arri Alexa? - Reviewed: Darren Brownlie
- ALT1:
Created by Captain Assassin! (talk). Self-nominated at 16:10, 24 July 2015 (UTC).
[[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]]
Long enough and new enough relative to the date of the nomination and article creation. QPQ review performed. Checks for copyvio reveals no problems (e.g. [1]). Content of the initial hook is verified with an inline citation to a reliable source. Content of ALT1 does not appear to exist as such, upon review of the source used in the article at the end of the sentence. As such, ALT1 is not approved at this time.
- In terms of moving forward with the initial hook, my only concern is that the last three sections in the article above the References section have no sources whatsoever. In the spirit of the DYK supplementary rules, which states that all paragraphs should have at least one inline citation to a reliable source, I feel that better sourcing would better-qualify the entry. Yes, they're not paragraphs per se, but they are entire sections that are unsourced. North America1000 12:25, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- @Northamerica1000: First of all, why do you always use "DYKno" template for any simple or bigger issues? Personally, I don't like it. Second, contents of those three sections are already cited in the body of the article, and that's why it is not necessary. --Captain Assassin! «T ♦ C ♦ G» 15:56, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- In terms of moving forward with the initial hook, my only concern is that the last three sections in the article above the References section have no sources whatsoever. In the spirit of the DYK supplementary rules, which states that all paragraphs should have at least one inline citation to a reliable source, I feel that better sourcing would better-qualify the entry. Yes, they're not paragraphs per se, but they are entire sections that are unsourced. North America1000 12:25, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
For the initial hook, matters turn out to be in order. Upon further research, and following the sources in the article, which was laboring because verification is not direct, the sourcing is adequate, so the initial hook qualifies at this time. ALT1 remains as stated above, not qualified per a lack of proper sourcing. I have struck ALT1 above. Sources in the last three sections of the article to directly verify content would still be preferable, though. North America1000 16:42, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
